Relatives' Anguish Regarding Shoreline Erosion Threatening Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards
Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.
Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles
One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Grave in Peril
Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.
“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”
In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”
Searching for Solutions and Certainty
An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.
Several families want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is approaching.
“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”
It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”
The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.